#5 – You can be My Friend [on] Flickr

This was the image that caught my eye off flickr for commenty purposes… there were lots of rather impressive pics, in a range of ways, but this one was interesting not just because it was beautiful but because in reading the comments, which I hadn’t really bothered to do much on previous expeditions into flickr, I realised that one of the signs of a true 2.0 site is people recruiting – but differentially. Seriously, scroll down and see how many people are asking the photographer to join “invitation-only” groups.

I know it’s a little mean… but I can’t help thinking “join the cool gang” when I see that stuff.

People are funny.

Tricknology

So this week’s blog topic is technology.

I have a lot to say about it and not much time – I have to leave shortly. Here’s a question I grapple with, quite uncomfortably too, being a confirmed technophile:

Is IT inherently weighted in favour of falsehood?

I’m not just talking about Wikipedia edits or the scary prospect of CGI news. Those things are bad enough. I’m talking about the inherent nature of IT, not just electronic but everything back to language.

The way we learn is through repetition. Big Lie theory springs from the fact that it is hard to resist giving some credence, or at least avoid finding it easy to think, something that’s repeated often enough. It’s legacy from our animal past; I’m no behaviourist but Pavlov and Skinner can’t be rejected totally. If something happens a lot we tend to notice and bear it in mind. If that something is an idea, we tend to think in terms of that idea. That’s why it takes generations to work something like sexism or racism out of a culture; by and large a prevalent idea is simply too hard to get out of people’s heads, even if they consciously disagree with it, and you have to rely on the kids who haven’t grown up with the toxic idea as much to work out how to think in ways less tainted by the original lie. Of course, those kids can take things for granted and not see the need to be consciously analytical… but I digress, you get my point.

Assimilation through simple repetition was a viable learning mechanism when culture didn’t shape so much of the world, when we were surrounded by nature, which is what it is and doesn’t pretend otherwise (camouflage and various deceptive adaptations aside). By and large, there was a direct, honest, consistent and unmanipulated link between external information and the real world. Without IT, without language, truth is kind of hard to avoid.
But IT makes the mass production and dissemination of information possible, and doesn’t care whether that information is true or not.

In other words, truth is all around us all the time anyway, and IT gives lies the same reach and (often) more convincing – or at least distracting – presentation.

This is kind of a gloomy view. But it’s a serious question. And I don’t have a good answer.

It is some consolation, though, to think that if there is an effective bias towards falsehood in the medium, it seems likely that there’s a corresponding bias towards truth in most of the people using it.

Just some rushed, random thoughts. I have to run now.

All aghast

It hasn’t taken long for blogging to go to my head. I’m going to launch my first official rant.

We seem to have this bizarre mental block in this country about its first peoples. It’s best summarized for me by a story told by Prof. Judy Atkinson, an Indigenous woman with a PhD and decades of awesome work with women, children and men on violence and abuse of all kinds to her name. Her work has globally applicable insights and takes a deeply mindful approach to the reasons people abuse and the transgenerational effects of that abuse. The book I’ve linked to above, Trauma Trails, is an eye-opening read that I recommend to anyone; it gave me plenty to think about in terms of my own family and cultural (Irish) history.

This extraordinary woman was in Canberra talking to senior bureaucrats about the problems of abuse in Indigenous communities. Unsurprisingly, education is one of the pillars of her approach to try and reduce and prevent the harm being perpetrated (and perpetuated) in these, or any, communities. She was talking to a senior ministerial advisor about the desirability of getting Indigenous people into education and was told to her face, her professorial face, that “her people” could “only manage a Certificate 1″.

Huh?!?

It will be no surprise to anyone that although she was commenting publicly on the Ampe Akelyernemane Meke Mekarle (Little Children are Sacred) report before the Federal government decided to send in the troops to fix child abuse in the NT, and despite being one of the nation’s foremost experts on child abuse in general and Indigenous child abuse in particular, her considerable wisdom is being completely ignored.

Setting aside the general problems with the intervasionvention (which are considerable, but which others are doing a better and more authoritative job of criticising than I could hope to), this points to a more general problem with the unconscious culture of this country. We seem to be totally unable to regard Indigenous people as authority figures, and the number that we even take pride in is pitifully small compared to their achievements.

Another example: our country has what is believed to be the oldest known representation of a human face in the world in rock art on the Burrup peninsula in WA, among a huge collection of art that is tens of thousands of years old. Instead of protecting this piece of world heritage, let alone respecting the traditional owners’ spiritual beliefs about the sanctity of the site, our nation has given the go-ahead to build a gas processing plant over part of this unique cultural treasure.

If this country had any ability to treasure Indigenous people and culture we would never even consider such a move. The Burrup would be a major point of national pride. But because there is so much unaddressed shame in our colonial nation’s history, in our past (and present!) treatment of Indigenous people, we can’t look Indigenous culture in the eye enough to see its value to us as the present co-tenants of this continent. (Let alone recognising the rights and values of Indigenous people themselves!)

We can flog paintings to make a buck (often ripping Indigenous artists off along the way), and some professional thinkers and culture-workers can begin to grasp what we have, but as a nation we can’t actually admit that we’re sitting on a treasure trove because that would mean respecting and being grateful to the communities that created that treasure.

All agog

My first ever post in my first ever blog. Gosh!

I’ve posted on plenty of blogs in my time, but never actually bothered to set one up myself. It’s not my first venture into self-publishing though; I edited and published an arts zine for secondary and uni students for a year in ’95-’96, putting out about 20 issues of (on average) 16 pages.

This is a LOT easier than manual and electronic layout, printing and distributing and all the rest. But it IS trickier to do funky layout stuff with. Not that I was wildly innovative, but I’ve always enjoyed playing with design, so we’ll see what I can get this blog to do.

That, incidentally, is why blogagogue. Since, as is often and truly said, there’s no better way to learn than to try to teach, I aim to teach these pages a thing or two. Well, this page anyway; I doubt WordPress has much to learn from me.

Be back once I’ve had a go at some stuff.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.